lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org):
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > Patch tests fine for me for expected capability behavior with lsm=n,
> > lsm=y, lsm=y+capability=y, lsm=y+selinux=y, and lsm=y+caps=y+selinux=y.
> >
> > So while I'm opposed to the patch, it appears to be safe.
>
> I've also tested a bunch of scenarios: allmodconfig, lsm=y,cap=n,
> selinux=y,cap=n etc.

I was wondering about the uninlining of all those functions, so did a
set of performance runs. Found no statistically relevant change in
dbench, tbench, or reaim. (tried to run kernbench too but the benchmark
failed somewhere and i didn't care enough to look into it)

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-28 04:51    [W:0.120 / U:0.540 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site