![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:51:47PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> > > Rename struct pci_driver data so that false section mismatch > warnings won't be produced. > > Sam, ISTM that depending on variable names is the weakest & worst part of > modpost section checking. Should __init_refok work here? I got build > errors when I tried to use it, probably because the struct pci_driver > probe and remove methods are not marked "__init_refok". Relying on naming is obviously a bad thing but without doing so we would have tons of warnings from drivers/ __init_refok is for functions. For this case __initdata_refok could have worked but to be consistent the renaming is much better. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-26 04:35 [W:0.121 / U:0.540 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||