[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

> On Jun 26, 2007, wrote:
>> unless you are saying that the GPLv3 is saying that a third party link
>> now _is_ sufficiant.
> Yup. The improvement in GPLv3 is to relax the requirement of
> providing source code in physical medium if you choose to not
> distribute it along with the binaries. It's recognizing that internet
> access is no longer a barrier that could stop someone from obtaining
> the sources they're entitled to. Even someone who doesn't have
> regular or fast internet access can hire a third party who does to
> perform the download and record it.
> I.e., with GPLv3, you *can* point at the sources you used, even in a
> site that you don't control.
> However, if the site takes the sources out, you're still responsible
> for providing sources to those who received the sources from you from
> that point on. Or something like that, IANAL ;-)

this sounds like a step backwards, you may not have the sources at that
point if you were relying on the other site to host them.

and by the way, internet access never was a barrier that could stop
someone from obtaining them, the only issue was you hosting the source vs
someone else hosting the source.

David Lang
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-26 22:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean