Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 | From | Alexandre Oliva <> | Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:44:13 -0300 |
| |
On Jun 26, 2007, david@lang.hm wrote:
> unless you are saying that the GPLv3 is saying that a third party link > now _is_ sufficiant.
Yup. The improvement in GPLv3 is to relax the requirement of providing source code in physical medium if you choose to not distribute it along with the binaries. It's recognizing that internet access is no longer a barrier that could stop someone from obtaining the sources they're entitled to. Even someone who doesn't have regular or fast internet access can hire a third party who does to perform the download and record it.
I.e., with GPLv3, you *can* point at the sources you used, even in a site that you don't control.
However, if the site takes the sources out, you're still responsible for providing sources to those who received the sources from you from that point on. Or something like that, IANAL ;-)
-- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |