lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
    Quoting James Morris (jmorris@namei.org):
    > On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
    >
    > > It's useful for some LSMs to be modular, and LSMs which are y/n options won't
    > > have any security architecture issues with unloading at all.
    >
    > Which LSMs? Upstream, there are SELinux and capabilty, and they're not
    > safe as loadable modules.
    >
    > > The mere fact
    > > that SELinux cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for
    > > disabling LSM modules as a whole, so please don't.
    >
    > That's not the argument. Please review the thread.

    The argument is 'abuse', right?

    Abuse is defined as using the LSM hooks for non-security applications,
    right?

    It seems to me that the community is doing a good job of discouraging
    such abuse - by redirecting the "wrong-doers" to implement proper
    upstream solutions, i.e. taskstats, the audit subsystem, etc.

    Such encouragement seems a far better response than taking away freedoms
    and flexibility from everyone.

    -serge
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-26 05:59    [W:0.022 / U:30.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site