[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
Quoting James Morris (
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > It's useful for some LSMs to be modular, and LSMs which are y/n options won't
> > have any security architecture issues with unloading at all.
> Which LSMs? Upstream, there are SELinux and capabilty, and they're not
> safe as loadable modules.
> > The mere fact
> > that SELinux cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for
> > disabling LSM modules as a whole, so please don't.
> That's not the argument. Please review the thread.

The argument is 'abuse', right?

Abuse is defined as using the LSM hooks for non-security applications,

It seems to me that the community is doing a good job of discouraging
such abuse - by redirecting the "wrong-doers" to implement proper
upstream solutions, i.e. taskstats, the audit subsystem, etc.

Such encouragement seems a far better response than taking away freedoms
and flexibility from everyone.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-26 05:59    [W:0.137 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site