![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > It's useful for some LSMs to be modular, and LSMs which are y/n options won't > have any security architecture issues with unloading at all. Which LSMs? Upstream, there are SELinux and capabilty, and they're not safe as loadable modules. > The mere fact > that SELinux cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for > disabling LSM modules as a whole, so please don't. That's not the argument. Please review the thread. - James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-25 21:17 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||