[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:

> It's useful for some LSMs to be modular, and LSMs which are y/n options won't
> have any security architecture issues with unloading at all.

Which LSMs? Upstream, there are SELinux and capabilty, and they're not
safe as loadable modules.

> The mere fact
> that SELinux cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for
> disabling LSM modules as a whole, so please don't.

That's not the argument. Please review the thread.

- James
James Morris
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-25 23:17    [W:0.112 / U:2.588 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site