![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Monday 25 June 2007 06:33, James Morris wrote: > Convert LSM into a static interface, as the ability to unload a security > module is not required by in-tree users and potentially complicates the > overall security architecture. It's useful for some LSMs to be modular, and LSMs which are y/n options won't have any security architecture issues with unloading at all. The mere fact that SELinux cannot be built as a module is a rather weak argument for disabling LSM modules as a whole, so please don't. Thanks, Andreas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-25 20:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||