lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 25 Jun 2007 00:58:48 -0400 (EDT)
FromJames Morris <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH try #2] security: Convert LSM into a static interface
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Petr Vandrovec wrote:

> > -module_param(debug, bool, 0600);> > -MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Debug enabled or not");
> > +static int __init root_plug_debug(char *str)> > +{> > +	debug = simple_strtol(str, NULL, 0);> > +	return 1;> > +}> > +__setup("root_plug_debug=", root_plug_debug);> > is this necessary?  What about just documenting> root_plug.{vendor_id,product_id,debug}, so it won't break existing root_plug
> users (if there are any) ?  I thought that typed module_param() is prefered
> over untyped __setup()...

I didn't know module_param was preferred.

The idea was that root_plug is example code, and should do the typical 
thing, which I thought would be __setup.

I can easily change it if needed.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-25 05:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008