[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] security: Convert LSM into a static interface

    --- Chris Wright <> wrote:

    > * Casey Schaufler ( wrote:
    > > So, for planning purposes, when ought I expect to have to start
    > > dealing with this?
    > What is your specific concern or use case?

    Just hoping to avoid a change collision. If I have to deal
    with this today it's easy, if it doesn't show up anywhere
    until 2.6.28 I'm breezing, but if it all hits in two weeks I
    have some scrambling and yet another delay to deal with. Not
    your problem, a little information would be helpful though.

    BTW, I reviewed my notes from the early days of LSM and it
    turns out that I agree with the notion that loadable modules
    don't make a whole lot of sense. So long as I can choose
    security models as easily as I can change file systems, I'm
    reasonably happy. That, and that the "default" "regular"
    policy isn't too terribly different from the traditional
    Unix policy.

    Casey Schaufler
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-25 05:39    [W:0.019 / U:32.244 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site