![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
--- Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org> wrote: > * Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com) wrote: > > So, for planning purposes, when ought I expect to have to start > > dealing with this? > > What is your specific concern or use case? Just hoping to avoid a change collision. If I have to deal with this today it's easy, if it doesn't show up anywhere until 2.6.28 I'm breezing, but if it all hits in two weeks I have some scrambling and yet another delay to deal with. Not your problem, a little information would be helpful though. BTW, I reviewed my notes from the early days of LSM and it turns out that I agree with the notion that loadable modules don't make a whole lot of sense. So long as I can choose security models as easily as I can change file systems, I'm reasonably happy. That, and that the "default" "regular" policy isn't too terribly different from the traditional Unix policy. Casey Schaufler casey@schaufler-ca.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-25 03:39 [W:0.797 / U:0.070 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||