lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 24 Jun 2007 13:07:46 +0200
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v18
* Antonino Ingargiola <tritemio@gmail.com> wrote:

> Anyway, I've discovered with great pleasure that CFS has also the 
> SCHED_ISO priority. I may have missed something, but I don't remember 
> to have read this in any of the CFS release notes :). For me this is a 
> really useful feature. Thanks.

well, it's only a hack and emulated: SCHED_ISO in CFS is recognized as a 
policy but it falls back to SCHED_NORMAL. Could you check how well this 
(i.e. SCHED_NORMAL) works for your workload, compared to SD's SCHED_ISO? 
If you'd like to increase the priority of a task, i'd suggest to use 
negative nice levels. (use the 'nice' option in 
/etc/security/limits.conf with a newer version of PAM to allow 
unprivileged users to use negative nice levels.)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-24 11:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2008