Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 23 Jun 2007 10:25:15 +0100 | From | Alan Cox <> | Subject | Re: [patch 03/10] Allow userspace applications to use marker.h to parse the markers section in the kernel binary. |
| |
O> > Out of curiosity, what is the kernel infrastructure you believe I should > > be using to get a list of all available markers in a kernel? Note that > > I also have a requirement to get a list of all available markers in a > > kernel that isn't the currently running one. > > None. Modules using markers should ship with the kernel or be written > on deman and not beeing created by some unreliable parser.
And what do you think should happen in the real world instead of Christoph fantasy land ?
Getting the marker exports right is what is needed to avoid having an unreliable parser and ending up with a reliable one.
Or would you rather someone loaded a JVM into kernel space so it was "shipped with the kernel"
Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |