[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RC][PATCH -mm] PM: Prevent frozen user mode helpers from failing the freezing of tasks

    > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <>
    > At present, if a user mode helper is running while usermodehelper_pm_callback()
    > is executed, the helper may be frozen and the completion in
    > call_usermodehelper_exec() won't be completed until user space processes are
    > thawed. As a result, the freezing of kernel threads may fail, which is not
    > desirable.
    > Prevent this from happening by introducing a counter of running user mode
    > helpers and allowing usermodehelper_pm_callback() to succeed for
    > action = PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE or action = PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE only if there
    > are no helpers running. [Namely, usermodehelper_pm_callback() waits for at most
    > RUNNING_HELPERS_TIMEOUT for the number of running helpers to become zero and
    > fails if that doesn't happen.]
    > Special thanks to Uli Luckas <> for reviewing the previous
    > versions of this patch and for very useful comments.
    > Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <>

    Eh, not sure this header is worth anything. Sometimes I'm lazy and
    stop when I see first problem.

    > switch (action) {
    > usermodehelper_disabled = 1;
    > - return NOTIFY_OK;
    > + retval = wait_event_timeout(running_helpers_waitq,
    > + atomic_read(&running_helpers) == 0,

    Are you sure here? What happens when atomic variable changes between
    the atomic_read and the function call?
    (cesky, pictures)
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-22 23:11    [W:0.021 / U:147.124 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site