lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: SATA Harddisk speed drop of 100 MB/s
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:36:52PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> also do a
>
> echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio
>
> first to see if that helps

That makes no difference.

It took a while before I replied - because I first want to do a bisect
to find a version closer to the problem.

So far I found out that it's RAID only.

I have four disks:

Three times a western digital Raptor 10k rpm:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1
Firmware Revision: 20.07P20

And one Seagate Barracuda 7200 rpm:

ATA device, with non-removable media
Model Number: ST3320620AS
Firmware Revision: 3.AAE

The Raptors are in RAID5.

hdparm -tT gives me always > 4 GB/s cached reads, for example:
Timing cached reads: 8166 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4086.82 MB/sec

and the buffered disk reads do not significantly vary when
reading the devices directly (/dev/sda, /dev/sdb, /dev/sdc for
the Raptors and /dev/sdd for the Barracuda):

/dev/sda etc: Around 67 MB/sec
/dev/sdd : Around 75 MB/sec (so much for 10k rpm ...)

These numbers are weird in itself (the 67 should have been 75,
and the 75 should have been 54) - but at least they are constant.

What DOES *signficantly* change as function of kernel revision
is the buffered disk read with hdparm -tT /dev/md2

The normal speed I get is > 160, often 165 MB/sec. But with
kernel revisions over a certain version that drops to around
67 MB/sec - and at one point I even observed a drop in speed
every time I repeated the measurement until the speed was
around 30 MB/s !
At the moment I am (still) doing the bisect; I had some problems
compiling a pristine 2.6.18 and some problems with the config
(that differs significantly between 2.6.18 and 2.6.22) as well
as the problem that the kernel simply didn't compile for a large
range of revisions needed for the bisect (I needed to export
current_is_keventd with this patch:

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c525731..012e11b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -654,6 +654,7 @@ int current_is_keventd(void)
return ret;

}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(current_is_keventd);

/* Take the work from this (downed) CPU. */
static void take_over_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, unsigned int cpu)
)

I'll report back when I'm done with the bisect :)

--
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-22 18:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site