![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 6/20/07, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > Albert Cahalan wrote: > > Look, let's back up a bit here. At a high level, what exactly do > > you imagine that this behavior was intended for? I suggest you > > list some examples of the attacks that are blocked. > > > > Can you come up with a reasonable argument that the current behavior > > is the least painful restriction required to block those attacks? > > Does the current behavior block any attack that the proposed behavior > > would not? (list the attacks please) > > See above. Nope. I asked you to justify the existing behavior. Apparently you are unable to do so. This should be a hint. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-21 09:41 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||