[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

    > On Jun 21, 2007, wrote:
    >> frankly, I haven't checked the licenses on the software. I'd suggest
    >> going to and download all the source for all the
    >> different versions there.
    > Yeah, thanks, I remembered someone had posted that URL the second
    > after a hit Send :-(
    > I've already got cmd.tar.gz and I'm looking at it now.
    > Thanks again,
    >> by the way, it looks like there is one wireless driver that they ship
    >> in some releases but don't provide the source for. but if you plan on
    >> going after them for that you better go after everyone who ships
    >> binary kernel modules.
    > Only copyright holders of Linux can go after them on matters of kernel
    > drivers. Or is this driver derived from any software copyrighted by
    > myself? Or did you mean the FSF, with whom I'm not associated in any
    > way other than ideologically?

    from the page listed above

    NOTE: 4.0.1a and later releases contain Atmel WLAN drivers in addition to
    the other network adapter drivers that are posted here. These WLAN drivers
    were received by TiVo directly from Atmel and are under the terms of a
    formal non-disclosure agreement, so we cannot publish them under the terms
    of the GPL version 2. Atmel has since released a different version of the
    drivers under the GPL version 2; however, that release does not change our
    prior obligation with Atmel. At this time, we have no plans to use Atmel's
    publicly released drivers in our development.

    when I talked about 'going after tivo' I wasn't just refering to doing so
    with lawsuits. the way some people in this thread have acted I could see
    people trying to use this as 'the smoking gun' that proves that the evil
    tivo people didn't release everything they were supposed to.

    modules are a grey area, some are clearly derived from the kernel and some
    are just as clearly not derived from the kernel, most are not as clear. I
    don't know the situation for this particular module, but that has nothing
    to do with this topic.

    David Lang
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-21 09:33    [W:0.030 / U:3.712 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site