Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3? | From | Alexandre Oliva <> | Date | Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:00:22 -0300 |
| |
On Jun 21, 2007, "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> wrote:
> It's this simple, those who chose the GPLv2 for Linux and their > contributions to it don't want people to create derivative works of their > works that can't be Tivoized.
Do you agree that if there's any single contributor who thinks it can't be tivoized, and he manages his opinion to prevail in court against a copyright holder, then it can't? That this is the same privilege to veto additional permissions that Al Viro has just claimed?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/293 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/13/354 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/117 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/14/432
-- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |