[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Fix signalfd interaction with thread-private signals

On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Yeah well... I wanted to have the least surprise path... that is,
> without my patch, signalfd will "sometimes" steal the SIGSEGV depending
> on who races to the lock first

Oh, absolutely. I thought we all agreed that Ben's patch was the right
thing. It's been merged for some time now (even if it hasn't been merged
for as long as I initially _thought_, since I had forgotten to apply the
the first time around ;)

So yes, all my emails have been about the _current_ code.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-22 01:49    [W:0.070 / U:10.812 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site