Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:35:10 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches |
| |
Arjan van de Ven wrote: > --- linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug.org 2007-06-20 22:20:30.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/i386/Kconfig.debug 2007-06-20 22:20:55.000000000 -0700 > @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ config DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > config DEBUG_RODATA > bool "Write protect kernel read-only data structures" > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL > - depends on !KPROBES # temporary for 2.6.22 > help > Mark the kernel read-only data as write-protected in the pagetables, > in order to catch accidental (and incorrect) writes to such const > --- linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/Kconfig.debug.org 2007-06-20 22:20:28.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc5/arch/x86_64/Kconfig.debug 2007-06-20 22:20:44.000000000 -0700 > @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ source "lib/Kconfig.debug" > config DEBUG_RODATA > bool "Write protect kernel read-only data structures" > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL > - depends on !KPROBES # temporary for 2.6.22 > help > Mark the kernel read-only data as write-protected in the pagetables, > in order to catch accidental (and incorrect) writes to such const data.
Shouldn't we add something to the help texts?
+ This option also marks kernel text pages as write-protected, + except if you enable KPROBES.
CMIIW.
As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, replacing CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA by CONFIG_WRITEPROTECT_RODATA and CONFIG_WRITEPROTECT_TEXT might be a better idea. The latter should be mutual exclusive with CONFIG_KPROBES. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -==- =-=-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |