lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [36/37] Large blocksize support for ext2
On Jun 20, 2007  14:27 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > Hmmm... Actually there is nothing additional to be done after the earlier
> > > cleanup of the macros. So just modify copyright.
> >
> > It is NOT possible to have 64kB blocksize on ext2/3/4 without some small
> > changes to the directory handling code. The reason is that an empty 64kB
> > directory block would have a rec_len == (__u16)2^16 == 0, and this would
> > cause an error to be hit in the filesystem. What is needed is to put
> > 2 empty records in such a directory, or to special-case an impossible
> > value like rec_len = 0xffff to handle this.
> >
> > There was a patch to fix the 64kB blocksize directory problem, but it
> > hasn't been merged anywhere yet seeing as there wasn't previously a
> > patch to allow larger blocksize...
>
> mke2fs allows to specify a 64kb blocksize and IA64 can run with 64kb
> PAGE_SIZE. So this is a bug in ext2fs that needs to be fixed regardless.

True. I had increased the e2fsprogs blocksize to 16kB after testing it,
and after that it seems Ted increased it to 64kB after that. The 64kB
directory problem only came out recently.

> > Having 32kB blocksize has no problems that I'm aware of. Also, I'm not
> > sure how it happened, but ext2 SHOULD have an explicit check (as
> > ext3/4 does) limiting it to EXT2_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE. Otherwise it appears
> > that there would be no error reported if the superblock reports e.g. 16MB
> > blocksize, and all kinds of things would break.
>
> mke2fs fails for blocksizes > 64k so you are safe there. I'd like to see
> that limit lifted?

I don't think extN can go to past 64kB blocksize in any case.

> > There shouldn't be a problem with increasing EXT{2,3,4}_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE to
> > 32kB (AFAIK), but I haven't looked into this in a while.
>
> I'd love to see such a patch. That is also useful for arches that have
> PAGE_SIZE > 4kb without this patchset.

Definitely, which is why we had been working on this originally.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-21 00:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site