lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    From
    Date
    On Jun 20, 2007, "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> wrote:

    > On 19/06/07, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
    >> On Jun 18, 2007, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
    >> > In the GPLv3 world, we have already discussed in this thread how you can
    >> > follow the GPLv3 by making the TECHNICALLY INFERIOR choice of using a ROM
    >> > instead of using a flash device.
    >>
    >> Yes. This is one option that doesn't bring any benefits to anyone.
    >> It maintains the status quo for users and the community, but it loses
    >> the ability for the vendor to upgrade, fix or otherwise control the
    >> users. Bad for the vendor.

    > Also bad for the user

    We already know the vendor doesn't care about the user, so why should
    we take this into account when analyzing the reasoning of the vendor?

    The rest of your paragraph was covered in what I wrote, BTW.

    --
    Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
    FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
    Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
    Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-20 23:13    [W:0.022 / U:30.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site