lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 19 Jun 2007 22:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
FromChristoph Lameter <>
SubjectRe: Some thoughts on memory policies
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:

> There's quite a bit of room for improving and extending the existing
> code, and those options should likely be exhausted first.

There is a confusing maze of special rules if one goes beyond the simple 
process address space case. There are no clean rules on how to combine 
memory policies. Refcounting / updating becomes a problem because policies 
are intended to be only updated from the process that set them up. Look at 
the gimmicks that Paul needed to do to update memory policies when a 
process is migrated and the vmas on the stack for shmem etc etc.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-20 05:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2008