[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
    > Tivo didn't make the Linux success. More Tivos can definitely undo it.

    I don't think so.

    First, it's not Linux that made success, but rather GNU that uses Linux as
    its kernel. And, believe it or not, when people say Linux, they really mean
    GNU. People could care less what kernel they were running, as long as the
    system is up and runs the procs that offer their services.

    It was probably a strategic mistake for GNU to lock into Linux, instead of
    developing a system that would allow GNU to plug-and-play the Kernel. A
    mistake that could easily be rectified, given enough desire.

    Second, GPLv2 was/is probably instrumental to the success of GNU/Linux.
    That's because GPLv2 seems to be fair, which allows the largest possible
    community to form. Changing this fairness, driven by paranoia arguments, to
    hamper commercial entities to enter this community may possibly reduce the
    growth of this community.

    Interestingly, it's this same paranoia that drives kernel developer to
    renounce a "Stable Kernel API" for fear of exploitation by certain
    commercial entities. Which makes you kind of wonder, why they wouldn't move
    to GPLv3.

    Or does paranoia and paradox go hand in hand?



    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-20 00:59    [W:0.023 / U:8.684 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site