[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: limits on raid
    On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Lennart Sorensen wrote:

    > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 02:56:10PM -0700, wrote:
    >> yes, I'm useing promise drive shelves, I have them configured to export
    >> the 15 drives as 15 LUNs on a single ID.
    >> I'm going to be useing this as a huge circular buffer that will just be
    >> overwritten eventually 99% of the time, but once in a while I will need to
    >> go back into the buffer and extract and process the data.
    > I would guess that if you ran 15 drives per channel on 3 different
    > channels, you would resync in 1/3 the time. Well unless you end up
    > saturating the PCI bus instead.
    > hardware raid of course has an advantage there in that it doesn't have
    > to go across the bus to do the work (although if you put 45 drives on
    > one scsi channel on hardware raid, it will still be limited).

    I fully realize that the channel will be the bottleneck, I just didn't
    understand what /proc/mdstat was telling me. I thought that it was telling
    me that the resync was processing 5M/sec, not that it was writing 5M/sec
    on each of the two parity locations.

    David Lang
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-19 22:55    [W:0.020 / U:1.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site