Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21) | Date | Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:49:43 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday, 19 June 2007 02:28, Martin Bligh wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > >> I'm seeing this long (198) thread and just have no idea how it has > >> ended (wiki? hand-mailing?). > > > > I'm hoping it's not "ended". > > > > IOW, I really don't think we _resolved_ anything, although the work that > > Adrian started is continuing through the wiki and other people trying to > > track regressions, and that was obviously something good. > > > > But I don't think we really know where we want to take this thing in the > > long run. I think everybody wants a better bug-tracking system, but > > whether something that makes people satisfied can even be built is open. > > It sure doesn't seem to exist right now ;) > > I know you hate bugzilla ... but at least I can try to make that bit > of the process work better. > > The new version just rolled out does have a simple "regression" checkbox > (and you can search on it), which will hopefully help people keep track > of the ones already in bugzilla more easily. > > Thanks to Jon T, Dave J et al. for helping to figure out methods and > implement them.
Yes, good work, thanks a lot for it! The new interface is much better and more useful.
Greetings, Rafael
PS BTW, would that be possible to create the "Hibernation/Suspend" subcategory of "Power Management" that I asked for some time ago, please? :-)
-- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |