[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Versioning file system
alan wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Bodo Eggert wrote:
>> alan <> wrote:
>>> I just wish that people would learn from the mistakes of others. The
>>> MacOS is a prime example of why you do not want to use a forked
>>> filesystem, yet some people still seem to think it is a good idea.
>>> (Forked filesystems tend to be fragile and do not play well with
>>> non-forked filesystems.)
>> What's the conceptual difference between forks and extended user
>> attributes?
> Forks tend to contain more than just extended attributes. They contain
> all sorts of other meta-data including icons, descriptions, author
> information, copyright data, and whatever else can be shoveled into them
> by the author/user.

And that makes them different from extended attributes, how?

Both of these really are nothing but ad hocky syntactic sugar for
directories, sometimes combined with in-filesystem support for small
data items.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-18 23:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean