Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2007 21:09:04 +0200 | From | "Michal Piotrowski" <> | Subject | Re: [patch 00/26] Current slab allocator / SLUB patch queue |
| |
On 18/06/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > Still the same. > > Is it still exactly the same strack trace?
Not exactly the same [<c0480d4b>] list_locations+0x257/0x2ad is the only difference
l *list_locations+0x257 0xc1080d4b is in list_locations (mm/slub.c:3655). 3650 l->min_pid); 3651 3652 if (num_online_cpus() > 1 && !cpus_empty(l->cpus) && 3653 n < PAGE_SIZE - n - 60) { 3654 n += sprintf(buf + n, " cpus="); 3655 n += cpulist_scnprintf(buf + n, PAGE_SIZE - n - 50, 3656 l->cpus); 3657 } 3658 3659 if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !nodes_empty(l->nodes) &&
> There could be multiple issue > if we overflow PAGE_SIZE there.
Regards, Michal
-- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |