lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: How to improve the quality of the kernel?
    Date
    Michal Piotrowski wrote:
    > On 18/06/07, Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:
    > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
    > > > On Sunday 17 June 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
    > > > > We of course do want to minimise the amount of overhead for each
    > > > > developer. I'm a strong believer in specialisation: rather than
    > > > > requiring that *every* developer/maintainer integrate new steps in
    > > > > their processes it would be better to allow them to proceed in a
    > > > > close-to-usual fashion and to provide for a specialist person (or
    > > > > team) to do the sorts of things which you're thinking about.
    > > >
    > > > Makes sense... however we need to educate each and every developer
    > > > about importance of the code review and proper recognition of
    > > > reviewers.
    > >
    > > That's as easy to manage as is currently done with rc-regressions.
    >
    > Are you a volunteer?

    Probably not, as this task requires a real PRO!

    > It's not an easy task, there are more patches than regressions.

    I didn't say it was an easy task, and it probably involves a lot of stamina.

    But the management aspect looks rather straight forward, yet rewarding.


    Thanks!

    --
    Al

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-18 05:57    [W:0.025 / U:90.456 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site