Messages in this thread | | | From | Al Boldi <> | Subject | Re: How to improve the quality of the kernel? | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:41:41 +0300 |
| |
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 17 June 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > We of course do want to minimise the amount of overhead for each > > developer. I'm a strong believer in specialisation: rather than > > requiring that *every* developer/maintainer integrate new steps in their > > processes it would be better to allow them to proceed in a > > close-to-usual fashion and to provide for a specialist person (or team) > > to do the sorts of things which you're thinking about. > > Makes sense... however we need to educate each and every developer about > importance of the code review and proper recognition of reviewers.
That's as easy to manage as is currently done with rc-regressions.
Maybe Adrian can introduce a "Patch Review Tacking" system akin to the his "rc-Regression Tracking" system.
Thanks!
-- Al
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |