lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    From
    Date
    On Jun 17, 2007, "Gabor Czigola" <czigola@gmail.com> wrote:

    > I wonder why the linux kernel development community couldn't propose
    > an own GPL draft (say v2.2) that is "as free as v2" and that includes
    > some ideas (from v3) that are considered as good (free, innovative, in
    > the spirit of whatever etc.) by the majority of the kernel developers.

    For one, because the text of the GPL is copyrighted by the FSF, and
    licensed without permission for modification. And that's as it should
    be, you don't want others to modify the terms of the license you chose
    for your code, do you?

    --
    Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
    FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
    Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
    Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-17 20:57    [W:0.020 / U:32.708 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site