Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: v2.6.21.4-rt11 | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Date | Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:59:18 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:49 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote: > > > There are many choices and > > > I don't know what is the more friendly. By friendly I mean the one that > > > is likely to be merged and that cooperate with you. > > > > Which choices do you mean ? > > I mean implementations. I've seen lot of them but i don't know which one > to try (I'm new to RT and the implementation in this thread seems to > be very nice).
Thanks :)
> > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/realtime-preempt/patch-2.6.21.4-rt14 > > > > > > : undefined reference to `usecs_to_cycles' > > > make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > > > > Which ARM sub arch ? > > sub arch AT91 -- (Atmel AT91RM9200 processor).
It lacks support for the generic timeofday and clock event layers, which causes the compile breakage.
I take a look at the compile errors and ping somebody who is working on support for AT91 to send out the patches ASAP.
tglx
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |