[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 00:44 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2007, Tim Post <> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 23:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> Tivo has two choices: either it gives
> >> users the content they want to watch, or it goes out of business. Is
> >> that legitimate enough of a reason to restrict the hardware?
> > Can I submit that they could just rent the use of their machines?
> I don't think this would escape the wording of section 6 in GPLv3dd4:
> [...] User Product is transferred to the recipient in perpetuity or
> for a fixed term (regardless of how the transaction is
> characterized), [...]
> and IMHO that's as it should be to defend the freedoms of the user.

Yes, I think you're right. There may be no good solution for tivo.

I'm not yet ready to give up on middle ground! :) I'll just have to work
harder if I'm to think of it. I refuse to accept a situation where the
only good outcome results in people being hurt, one way or another.

You might see that as futility, it could very well be. But I feel
obligated to keep looking and thinking because I can.

My head hurts.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-16 06:37    [W:1.248 / U:1.736 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site