[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    Krzysztof Halasa <> writes:
    > > So, by making the COPYING contain the v2 text, is the author
    > > specifying a particular version? If yes, then the sec. 9 provision
    > > would be meaningless, since there would be no way to not specify a
    > > version number.
    > Of course the "published under terms of GPL." would do.

    It would do, if you could stop there and say no more. But:

    You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's source
    code as you receive it, in any medium, provided that you...give any
    other recipients of the Program a copy of this License along with the
    Program. [GPLv2, section 1]

    So you have to give recipients the license text from a particular
    version of the GPL. To make that the only version unde which the work
    is licensed, you have to add something like "Licensed under the
    GPLv2". Otherwise sec. 9 says that you offer the work under any
    version of the GPL, and the licensee can take his or her pick -- even
    using v1 (!).

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-16 16:05    [W:0.018 / U:0.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site