Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:21:57 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
| |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> Oh great, then things like source code control systems would have no > problems with new files being created under them, or renaming whole > trees.
It depends -- I think we may be talking about different things.
If you're using inotify to watch for new files and kick something in userspace to relabel them, it could take a while to relabel a lot of files, although there are likely some gains to be had from parallel relabeling which we've not explored.
What I was saying is that you can use traditional SELinux labeling policy underneath that to ensure that there is always a safe label on each file before it is relabeled from userspace.
> So, so much for the "it's going to be too slow re-labeling everything" > issue, as it's not even required for almost all situations :)
You could probably get an idea of the cost by running something like:
$ time find /usr/src/linux | xargs setfattr -n user.foo -v bar
On my system, it takes about 1.2 seconds to label a fully checked out kernel source tree with ~23,000 files in this manner, on a stock standard ext3 filesystem with a SATA drive.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |