lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    From
    Date
    On Jun 15, 2007, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

    > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
    >>
    >> So, you see, your statement above, about wanting to be able to use
    >> other people's improvements, cannot be taken without qualification.

    > No. Linus and other Linux kernels might *want* to take other people's
    > improvements, but thanks to Richard Stallman's choices for GPLv3, they
    > can *not* legally take other people's improvements without violating
    > the GPLv3 license.

    This argument is backwards. It's because of Linus' choice for GPLv2
    that he can't take improvements under the GPLv3.

    Had he chosen any other GPLv3-compatible license, he could.

    And the same applies to any other incompatible pair of licenses.

    --
    Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
    FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
    Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
    Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-15 23:13    [W:0.021 / U:29.780 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site