lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    From
    Date
    On Jun 15, 2007, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmail.fm> wrote:

    > What happens if you're debugging something you think is a bug in the
    > Linux kernel and then you run bang into some interactions that make you
    > think the bug might be in the BIOS instead.

    > have denied your freedom to modify and debug the system they sold you

    If the bug is in the non-GPLed BIOS, not in the GPLed code, too bad.
    One more reason to dislike non-Free Software.

    The freedom the GPL defends is not the freedom to modify and debug the
    system, but rather the covered software.

    Now, if you find evidence that the "bug" is actually intentionally put
    there to stop you from doing what you wanted with the software, then
    there's clearly a violation of the spirit of the license, and you
    might even have a case of copyright infringement, but IANAL.

    --
    Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
    FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
    Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
    Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-15 21:31    [W:0.074 / U:30.260 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site