![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <mperkel@yahoo.com> wrote: > I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate > and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is > nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe > that GPL3 is just GPL3 improved. > > So - just throwing out the idea that if Linus is > unhappy with GPL3 that Linux lose the GPLx license and > call it the Linux Kernel License or LKL for short. So > LKL could equal GPL2. It seems it would require agreement by all copyright holders, much like the v2->v3 transition would do. If it makes the 2->3 transition unfeasible, the same may apply here. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-15 08:39 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||