[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    Daniel Hazelton wrote
    > If "DRM" was against the license then an extra section clearly
    > explaining that could have been added. (in the DRM case I actually
    > understand the reasoning and agree with it.)

    Changing licenses is not like changing software code, re-licensing is
    a major hassle so "release early, release often" is not a viable

    That means GPL v3 is not a nice localised incremental patch but a huge
    patchset on all the issues that have accumulated since GPLv2 was
    written (and one can discuss the correctness of parts of this

    Nicolas Mailhot

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-15 18:17    [W:0.022 / U:72.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site