Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:53:54 +0200 (CEST) | | Subject | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 | | From | "Nicolas Mailhot" <> |
| |
Daniel Hazelton wrote > If "DRM" was against the license then an extra section clearly > explaining that could have been added. (in the DRM case I actually > understand the reasoning and agree with it.)
Changing licenses is not like changing software code, re-licensing is a major hassle so "release early, release often" is not a viable strategy.
That means GPL v3 is not a nice localised incremental patch but a huge patchset on all the issues that have accumulated since GPLv2 was written (and one can discuss the correctness of parts of this patchset)
-- Nicolas Mailhot
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |