[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
> > As a PS to the GPL3 comment here is the basic difference
> >
> > ROM - I can't modify the code on the device
> > The creator can't modify the code further on the device
> >
> > Tivo - I can't modify the code on the device
> > The owner can modify the code
> >
> > One is an implicit limitation of the hardware (just like I can't run
> > openoffice on a 4MB PC even though the license gives me the right to
> > try), the other is an artificial restriction.
> >
> > One case is witholding freedom in the GPL sense by one party while
> > keeping it themselves, the other is a limitation of the system
> > inevitably imposed on everyone.
> I've been following this discussion and I find this interesting.
> Consider these two cases:
> 1.) I ship the device back to the manufacturer, they replace the ROM,
> and ship it back to me.
> 2.) I ship the device back to the manufacturer, they load new code
> into it, and ship it back to me.
> How do these two differ? Or is it now just a question of the ROM
> being in a socket? I can't see how the technicalities of how the
> hardware is constructed can change the legality of the software.

At first glance I think a construct where the manufacturer is obliged
to load _MY_ modified software in a timely fashion and at a reasonable
price into the device would fit my understanding of the GPL's spirit
though this leaves room for the definition of timely...

Technosis GmbH, Geschäftsführer: Michael Gerdau, Tobias Dittmar
Sitz Hamburg; HRB 89145 Amtsgericht Hamburg
Vote against SPAM - see
Michael Gerdau email:
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-14 07:29    [W:1.307 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site