![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>> + - device_type : Should be "rapidio" >> >> There is no OF binding, so no. > > So, we need to define it. If you want to. Until that has been done, don't use a "device_type". Linux won't use it, anyway. >>> + - compatible : Should be "fsl,rapidio-v0.0" or >> "fsl,rapidio-v1.0" >>> + and so on. The version number is got from IP Block Revision >>> + Register of RapidIO controller. >> >> It's better to use real device names, just like everyone >> else. > > Some silicons of Freescale processor are the same RapidIO controller, > such as mpc8540/mpc8560 are the same (v0.0), mpc8548/mpc8641 are the > same (v1.0). For v1.0 RapidIO controller, should we use mpc8548 or > mpc8641? Those will make people confused. Not at all. On an 8641 it could be compatible = "fsl,mpc8641-rapidio" "fsl,mpc8548-rapidio"; which states "this is the 8641 thing and it is compatible to the 8548 thing". Perfectly clear. > Using IP Block Revision is a > clear choice. I don't think so. For one thing, it describes a version of a cell design, not a version of an actual device. For another thing, if I hear "8641" I know what you're talking about (sort of, anyway), but I draw a blank stare if you say "v1.0". I'm sure I'm not the only one. Concrete names are good. >>> + - #address-cells : Address representation for >> "rapidio" devices. >>> + This field represents the number of cells needed to represent >>> + the RapidIO address of the registers. For >> supporting more than >>> + 36-bits RapidIO address, this field should be <2>. >> >> More than 32 bit? > > Yes, RapidIO bus address width is 34 bits. You said "more than 36 bit", I tried to ask if that is a typo perhaps. >> No. The format of an "interrupts" entry is defined by >> the interrupt domain this device sits in, not by the >> device itself. >> > Do you misunderstand the meaning of 'interrupts'? Hahaha. No, I don't misunderstand what the "interrupts" property means. Perhaps you do? > These interrupts is > issued from the RapidIO controller to the pic controller for tx, rx, > err, doorbell and message. But the rapidio node doesn't know or care what the interrupts are connected to, and neither should it. That's what the interrupt mapping recommended practice is for. >>> For this sector, interrupts order should be >>> + <err_irq bell_outb_irq bell_inb_irq msg1_tx_irq msg1_rx_irq >>> + msg2_tx_irq msg2_rx_irq ... msgN_tx_irq msgN_rx_irq>. >> >> That's to be defined in the binding for your specific device, >> not in a more generic rapidio binding. > > These description is just for compatible="fsl,rapidio-v*.*" rapidio > controller. Okay, good. Please make that way more obvious then :-) >>> + #address-cells = <2>; >> >> You want a #size-cells as well. > > The size is not used in this sector, so no defined. The size _is_ used; in the "ranges" property in this node, for example. It is also needed to describe the "reg" for any child node of this node. A non-existant "#size-cells" means 1, and "#address-cells" means 2, so in principle you could do without these properties; but Linux doesn't parse the tree correctly in that case (which reminds me, I have some more patches to send). > Thanks! My pleasure, Segher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-13 10:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||