lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    > find offensive, so I don't choose to use it. It's offensive because Tivo 
    > never did anything wrong, and the FSF even acknowledged that. The fact

    Not all of us agree with this for the benefit of future legal
    interpretation.

    > The GPLv2 is a *legal*license*. And no, the FSF doesn't get to define what
    > the words mean to suit their agenda.

    Agreed - everyone contributed to the kernel based upon the GPLv2. Lots of
    different reasons, lots of different viewpoints about GPL2 v GPL3, DRM ,
    Treacherous Computing, etc. The commonality is not political, not a
    grand plan, not a grand unified social agenda but a bunch of people for
    whom the GPLv2 was an acceptable license for furthering their intentions
    whether that is education for all, a shared commons or just making a
    quick buck

    Alan
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-13 23:55    [W:0.020 / U:31.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site