lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 13 Jun 2007 22:57:43 +0100
FromAlan Cox <>
SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
> find offensive, so I don't choose to use it. It's offensive because Tivo 
> never did anything wrong, and the FSF even acknowledged that. The fact 

Not all of us agree with this for the benefit of future legal
interpretation.

> The GPLv2 is a *legal*license*. And no, the FSF doesn't get to define what 
> the words mean to suit their agenda.

Agreed - everyone contributed to the kernel based upon the GPLv2. Lots of
different reasons, lots of different viewpoints about GPL2 v  GPL3, DRM ,
Treacherous Computing, etc. The commonality is not political, not a
grand plan, not a grand unified social agenda but a bunch of people for
whom the GPLv2 was an acceptable license for furthering their intentions
whether that is education for all, a shared commons or just making a
quick buck
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-13 23:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2008