[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
    > find offensive, so I don't choose to use it. It's offensive because Tivo 
    > never did anything wrong, and the FSF even acknowledged that. The fact

    Not all of us agree with this for the benefit of future legal

    > The GPLv2 is a *legal*license*. And no, the FSF doesn't get to define what
    > the words mean to suit their agenda.

    Agreed - everyone contributed to the kernel based upon the GPLv2. Lots of
    different reasons, lots of different viewpoints about GPL2 v GPL3, DRM ,
    Treacherous Computing, etc. The commonality is not political, not a
    grand plan, not a grand unified social agenda but a bunch of people for
    whom the GPLv2 was an acceptable license for furthering their intentions
    whether that is education for all, a shared commons or just making a
    quick buck

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-13 23:55    [W:0.019 / U:19.336 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site