![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 08:18:00PM +0200, holzheu wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >>> Ick, why are you ignoring what we have already with dev_printk() and >>> friends? We are just finally getting developers to use that, I think it >>> will be almost impossible to get people to change to something else, >>> especially one that isn't even as "correct" as what dev_printk() offers >>> you today, will be quite hard. >>> >>> So, why not use what we already have and work off of it? >> dev_printk() and friends are great, since they already define something >> like KMSG_COMPONENT: The driver name. > > They provide way more than that, they also provide the explicit device > that is being discussed, as well as other things depending on the > device. > > So if you are going to do this, please use the already-in-place macros > to hook into, don't try to get the driver authors to pick up something > new and different, as it's going to be _very_ difficult, trust me... absolutely... I'm currently trying to convince everyone to get a generic netdevice-centric printk macro (dev_printk does not print the interface name, which the netdevice can't store locally since it can change) in and even that is a pain :) Auke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-13 20:52 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||