lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

    * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

    > * Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > > I did run massive_intr.c for 60 secs with increasing nproc (
    > > 10,20,30,40,50,60) waiting for effects.
    > >
    > > Below a small table of the results
    > >
    > > 2.6.21.1-cfs-v16
    > >
    > > nproc , usability result
    > >
    > > 10 , serious frame drops , Firefox hardly recognizes clicked links,
    > > but still usable
    > > 20 - 30, usability loss ( somehow under cfs firefox never finished
    > > user requests like displaying web pages or opening new pages , no
    > > feedback anymore, sudden changes on the desktop )
    >
    > ouch! The expected load-testing result under CFS should be something
    > like this:
    >
    > http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007817.html

    i have just tried the same workload with cfs and with sd048 from -ck,
    and cannot reproduce this. To make sure it's not some other change in
    -ck, could you try the pure SD patches ontop of 2.6.21.1 too:

    http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patches/2.6.21-sd-0.48.patch
    http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patches/sched-sd-0.48-interactive_tunable.patch

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-06-12 11:01    [W:0.030 / U:62.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site