Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:51:45 +1200 | From | "Tobias Gerschner" <> | Subject | Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans) |
| |
2007/6/12, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>: > > * Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I did run massive_intr.c for 60 secs with increasing nproc ( > > 10,20,30,40,50,60) waiting for effects. > > > > Below a small table of the results > > > > 2.6.21.1-cfs-v16 > > > > nproc , usability result > > > > 10 , serious frame drops , Firefox hardly recognizes clicked links, > > but still usable > > 20 - 30, usability loss ( somehow under cfs firefox never finished > > user requests like displaying web pages or opening new pages , no > > feedback anymore, sudden changes on the desktop ) > > ouch! The expected load-testing result under CFS should be something > like this: > > http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007817.html > > could you send me the output of /proc/sched_debug? (while say a > "massive_intr 20" is running?) > > Roughly what hardware do you have? (could you send me your lspci -v > output and dmesg output?) > > Ingo >
Hi,
it's a peacock freeliner xp II. Close to 5 year old Laptop with an Athlon XP 2600+ using 1 GB of RAM / no swap enabled.
The other information will be sent as soon as I am back at work .
regards
-- Tobias Gerschner Member of Board of Yoper Linux Ltd. NZ
Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |