[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

* Tobias Gerschner <> wrote:

> I did run massive_intr.c for 60 secs with increasing nproc (
> 10,20,30,40,50,60) waiting for effects.
> Below a small table of the results
> nproc , usability result
> 10 , serious frame drops , Firefox hardly recognizes clicked links,
> but still usable
> 20 - 30, usability loss ( somehow under cfs firefox never finished
> user requests like displaying web pages or opening new pages , no
> feedback anymore, sudden changes on the desktop )

ouch! The expected load-testing result under CFS should be something
like this:

could you send me the output of /proc/sched_debug? (while say a
"massive_intr 20" is running?)

Roughly what hardware do you have? (could you send me your lspci -v
output and dmesg output?)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-12 10:39    [W:0.146 / U:8.632 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site