lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 10 Jun 2007 11:49:15 +0300
FromTarkan Erimer <>
SubjectRe: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Hi Neil,

Neil Brown wrote:
> On Saturday June 9, tarkan@netone.net.tr wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we know the forthcoming GPL V3 will be not compatible with the GPL V2 
>> and Linux Kernel is GPL V2 only.
>> So, another point is, which is previously mentioned by Linus and others, 
>> that if it is decided to upgrade the Linux Kernel's License to GPL V3, 
>> it is needed the permission of all the maintainers permission who 
>> contributed to the Linux Kernel and there are a lot of lost or dead 
>> maintainers. Which makes it impossible to get all the maintainers' 
>> permission.
>> 
>
> You don't need the permission of maintainers.  You need the permission
> of copyright owners.  The two groups overlap, but are not the same.
> Dead people cannot own anything, even copyright.  Their estate
> probably can.  I don't think it is theoretically impossible to get
> everyone's permission, though it may be quite close to practically
> impossible. 
>
> 
So, does it mean we can change the license of the dead people's code ?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-10 08:51    [from the cache]
©2003-2008