lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 2/9] Conditional Calls - Hash Table
> Yes, but as you have probably understood, I want to have everything
> embedded at the cond_call() site rather than polluting the rest of the
> code with declarations.

A cond call is essentially a fancy variable. And the Linux kernel
is written in C and in C you declare variables before you use them.
Also it would allow compile time checking against typos and
allow removing some nasty hash table code. The proposal sounds like a
clear winner to me.

> Also, if we have the same cond_calls in different modules, in which
> module shall it be defined ?

In one of them. Like all other variables in C.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-01 21:39    [W:0.616 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site