Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 01 Jun 2007 12:51:34 -0500 | From | Eric Sandeen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF |
| |
Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > [Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500] > | Andrew Morton wrote: > | > | >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK. > | > | Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a > | good thing.... :) > | > | Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to > | udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always > | immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate > | further. > | > | -Eric > | > > Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module > instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)
Not if it's already built in (at least not with more hackery than it's worth...) - just rebuild your kernel w/ udf as a module.
BTW my testcase before was bogus, that's not what's causing the lockup. I'll keep investigating now that I know what *not* to look for. ;-)
-Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |