Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Jun 2007 21:48:06 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF |
| |
[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500] | Andrew Morton wrote: | | >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK. | | Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a | good thing.... :) | | Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to | udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always | immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate | further. | | -Eric |
Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)
Cyrill
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |