lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Fix possible leakage of blocks in UDF
[Eric Sandeen - Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:17:53PM -0500]
| Andrew Morton wrote:
|
| >Recursive lock_kernel() is OK.
|
| Oh, it is? Clearly I am not well versed in the BKL... that's probably a
| good thing.... :)
|
| Ok, let me look into it further. I changed lock_kernel to
| udf_lock_kernel to complain & backtrace if we re-lock, and it always
| immediately hung after that; I assumed that was it. I'll investigate
| further.
|
| -Eric
|

Btw, Andrew is there any way to force kernel to use special UDF module
instead of compiled-in one? (Sorry for stupid question ;)

Cyrill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-01 19:51    [W:0.127 / U:1.180 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site