![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jens Axboe wrote: >>> >> I would personally argue that sendfile() blocking on an O_NONBLOCK >> desriptor, as opposed to returning EAGAIN, is a bug, and a fairly >> serious such. > > I agree, but it's still a change in behaviour. Even if we consider the > app buggy (it is), can we potentially break it? > It depends on which app it is, of course. However, I think we have to smoke that out the hard way. I don't think we should retain a bug in the kernel just because some unknown app might depend on that bug -- taking that to the extreme we could never fix bugs at all... -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-06-01 05:57 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||