![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send > > > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations > > > about the author's personal appearance, etc.> > > > Thanks Andrew,> > > > This means I can finally ack this patch (thanks Eric): > > > > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > > Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization" > > > > This reverts commit c9ccf30d77f04064fe5436027ab9d2230c7cdd94. > > I don't get it. Does lguest no longer need this code, or will > it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else? Lguest no longer needs it (the magic signature patch you took). HPA and Eric are brewing a new, shinier way for booting not-a-normal-pc which will address lguest as well as others. But it seems they first need to go through the "who knows most about ancient PCs" slapfight. Thanks! Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-05-10 03:33 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||